SKVY Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

11 Wall West » SKVY  

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
SKVY.OBHockalugi21 04-14-04  08:15 am
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 31
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 12:48 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks. That makes sense. I was just surprised to see it at .046 (although on light volume) considering it has not been that low in a quite a while.
I thought there may have been news out that I was unable to find and I know that this is the source to go to.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 3015
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 11:14 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hock - At the moment, it's down less than a penny, and less than one half of one percent of market cap has traded. I see that it got down to $0.046, but in a stock this small and this thin, it would be hard to get out of even a small position w/o moving it down that much.

Looking at the T&S, it took only about $10k of trading to reach the low, and that trade at .046 was for only $230, and had trades at .060 on either side of it.

(Message edited by public_heel on July 20, 2006)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 30
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 10:22 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Anyone know what happened today? I do not see any news on Reuters.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Posted on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 - 07:54 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

killernut...thanks for the input.

Question though
Since when are stocks valued on revenue? I thought it was a crap shoot at best and you may even do better in Vegas.

Revenues?????

That's a new one.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 2967
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 05:59 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

IMO, they need to do a reverse split (say 10:1), let the price come down to whatever it will and then it might be a buy. The truth of the matter is that it is way overvalued based on revenue (and any earnings) per share.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

edddddd
Unregistered guest
Posted on Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 01:41 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Does anyone like the direction this company is moving?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 173
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - 08:40 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If the recent behavior of other cheap stocks in the security sector is any indication, SKVY will probably be at $5 by Friday...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 24
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - 08:28 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This PR just out. I am curious to see if/how the stock will trade today.

RONKONKOMA, N.Y., July 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology
Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SKVY) announced today the installation of its
SentryVision(R) SmartTrack traveling CCTV systems in Cape Town, South Africa on
The Metro Rail Network to monitor passengers at the junction of bus, railway
and taxi services. SmartTrack will be an integral part of an overall crime
prevention and deterrence program including central management of all video
devices over a network. The SmartTrack system uses patented technology to
transmit video images from two pan, tilt and zoom cameras traveling along an
aluminum rail mounted on the ceiling or wall of a passenger platform. The
camera carriage travels at speeds of up to 13 feet per second and provides
unobstructed views of passenger activity that is not possible with conventional
camera systems. SmartTrack was supplied through Pentagon Distribution, Sentry
Technology's South African distribution partner.

"We are pleased to have SmartTrack included as an important component in
public transportation security," said Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of
Sentry Technology Corporation. "There are many other applications where our
proprietary traveling CCTV technology can be applied to help secure public
spaces. The successful installation of SmartTrack on rail platforms in South
Africa marks the beginning of our campaign to solicit business through the many
consulting firms and government agencies in the U.S. involved in Homeland
Security."

Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a
complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and
Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features the
proprietary SentryVision(R) SmartTrack patented traveling Surveillance System.
The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and internal
theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets and
people. The Company's acquisition of ID Systems expands the Company's product
offering to include proximity Access Control and Radio Frequency Identification
(RFID) solutions. For further information, please visit our website at
http://www.sentrytechnology.com.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 2380
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 13, 2005 - 05:48 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SKVY Q1 out.

Lowes loss really hurts. Back to losing money.

glad I avoided it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 2293
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 31, 2005 - 03:31 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Q4 and 04 results out.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050331/nyth168.html?.v=3

Not horrible, not great, but confirmation that going forward the Lowe's loss will hurt.

Those that took profits above $.20 did well. May see a small pop on results but I would guess it will drift down going forward.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 2238
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 04:47 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I haven't looked too closely lately but I don't think much has changed. I think the $.10 area is attractive.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 1564
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

K/N,

As you recently said on another board, "I suck at trading." Well, I don't just suck, I nibble. :-)

It seems that I made a pretty nifty trade on this one though.(in at .07, out at .24)

Now I'm wondering if it might not be getting close to buying territory again. I see it's currently at .145. You have said that you might be interested at .10.

Do you have any current thoughts on this thing?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bodega_bill
Registered Member
Username: Bodega_bill

Post Number: 175
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - 07:19 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I got rode out of town on this one. Saw the price dropping and bailed 25k at .18 the next day it hits .27-----------shit. I still think the news was awful, they lost their biggest customer as far as service goes and the stock goes up because they are changing the name and consolidating different divisions, so what. I doubt if they make money (profit) this period because of the loss of the Lowes account.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 1423
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - 11:39 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What a wild ride this SKVY has been these last couple of days; down midday yesterday to below .16, then back to .21 just before the close, and now up .04 to .25 this morning!

Just for the hell of it, I just put in an order to sell at .26. (Well, stranger things have happened! :-))
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 1998
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, January 03, 2005 - 04:50 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tycho, I had buy orders in at $.11 and one day (or more maybe) it traded down below that but I never got any.

I personally think it may be near a time to take profits but think you may be able to get a bit more if you hold on. Mid $.2X's seem to be old resistance and I would wait to see if it gets that high or maybe even break thru that high.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 1372
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, January 03, 2005 - 03:37 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Anyone noticing what this one's been doing since mid-December?

A good time to take profits or only the beginning of a bigger move?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 1781
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, November 15, 2004 - 01:20 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

$40K net profit for the quarter on great revenue?

Looks like the stock price likes it but if I had been able to grab any near the $.10 I would be selling.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 17
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Monday, November 15, 2004 - 12:41 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Earnings are out for SKVY and look pretty good.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Posted on Friday, October 22, 2004 - 05:09 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What is everyone thinking about the possibility of a buyout from ADT here? Looks like it may happen. I think that is what everyone is hoping for.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 1326
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, August 16, 2004 - 10:12 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I looked briefly. I think they might be able to maintain marginal profitibility. But they would need to have a huge improvement in net profitibility to ever have anything other than a astronomical PE.

That aside I think it is a buy if you can get it for ten or eleven cents.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bodega_bill
Registered Member
Username: Bodega_bill

Post Number: 128
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, August 16, 2004 - 09:12 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Any thoughts on the quarter? Looks like the corner might have been turned.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 1305
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 09:46 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I had a buy order in at $.11 for 50K shares and got none on the recent downdraft.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 12
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 09:07 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Any thoughts on the recent action?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 11
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, June 25, 2004 - 01:36 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sentry Technology Corporation CEO Interviewed By CEOcast


25 June 2004, 1:13pm ET

RONKONKOMA, N.Y., June 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology Corporation (BB:SKVY) announced today that Peter L. Murdoch, President & CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation, was interviewed by Ken Sgrow of CEOcast. CEOcast is the premier source of original and syndicated streaming broadcast interviews of Chief Executive Officers at public and private news- making companies. Organized by industry, its analysts average over 15 years experience covering and evaluating Wall Street's leading companies. Today's interview focuses on Sentry's restructuring, turnaround and current marketing plans that are producing positive results for the Company. The entire interview can be heard at http://www.ceocast.com .

Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features the SentryVision(R) SmartTrack system, a proprietary, patented traveling Surveillance System. The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and internal theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets and people. The Company's acquisition of ID Systems expands the Company's product offering to include library security and management tools, proximity Access Control and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) solutions. For further information, please visit our website at http://www.sentrytechnology.com .

This press release may include information that could constitute forward- looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such forward-looking statements may involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those matters disclosed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

SOURCE Sentry Technology Corporation
-0- 06/25/2004
/CONTACT: Peter Murdoch, President & CEO of Sentry Technology
Corporation, +1-631-739-2000 /
/Company News On-Call:
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 2253
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 04:11 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sorry - I meant that "floorlesses" are a subset of "toxics", not the other way around.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 2252
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 04:09 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

On 5/4, Brasscan bought 16.6m shares at .12, and 5m warrants at .15, giving them an immediate paper profit of $2.5m
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 884
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:48 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gotcha.

and like I said I need to check the .12 per share.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 2250
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:40 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

K/N - you're referring to "floorless", as far as I know. "Toxics" would be any case where the buyers of the converts could short the stock on the market at the same time they bought and lock in their profit. "Toxics" would thus be a subset of "floorlesses", though not nearly as insidious, as the convert buyers would not profit from a downward spiral in the price.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 882
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:28 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I always thought that toxic referred to the fact that the conversion would be set at a floating price as opposed to a set price.

Anyway I need to go back and look because some of the details are cloudy to me and all I remember was I figured $.10-$.12 would be a good place to buy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 2249
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:11 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If they were .12 per share, they were toxic when sold, and even more toxic now. I guess the important thing is that SKVY gets the $2m, but the relative toxicity of the converts would be a comment on the buyer's faith in the company's future...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 880
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:37 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

PH, not toxic but I think they are priced at $.12 per share. I think the new 10K will shed some more light. I have been waiting.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 9
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:28 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I unfortunately do not know how to even begin to look at how the financing was completed, but I am sure that Killernut would know. I have been owning this stock since it was mentioned on the old 11wall, and plan on holding most of my shares for a while longer.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 2247
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:18 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It looks like they are doing OK, especially with positive developments after the quarter closed. Do you know if that Brasco financing was done with toxic converts, by any chance?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 8
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:00 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SKVY just reported earnings. It seems like they are on the right track. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 800
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 10:22 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My thoughts on Brascan range from the great to the not so great.

Seems as if Brascan might really like what SKVY offers and this would bode well for SKVY. My concern (and I'm still digging) is that the managers of the Technology Fund may have previous connections with Murcoch which might not be in the common shareholders best interest.

I expect SKVY to remain volatile. I really want to read the SEC filings on the deal. I don't think they have been posted. (I could be wrong on that.) I will not change my mind until I do that. So for now I stay out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 7
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 10:06 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killernut,
I have been on vacation for the last few weeks and just saw the news on SKVY and the financing. Do you think that this is a good think for the long-term? It seems like there are a lot of people putting trust and money into SKVY for the future.
Thanks as always,
Hock-a-lugi
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 793
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 03:39 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Some info on the Brascan Technology Fund which recently closed the $2M financing deal with SKVY.

Looks like it is not a typical industry for them to invest in, but it also looks like they tied up some 5% of their capital in the SKVY investment.

http://www.brascanam.com/Alternative/opportunity.htm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jfh
Moderator
Username: Jfh

Post Number: 634
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 04:28 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gabe:

Gap says he didn't sabotage the threads, see "Technology" and "Medical" stocks. You should be proud of him
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 46
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, April 16, 2004 - 06:14 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for the feedback. I'd be happy if they were bought out at .75!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 445
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, April 15, 2004 - 11:50 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=skvy.ob
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tree_sloth
Registered Member
Username: Tree_sloth

Post Number: 412
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 11:05 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Also it had four times the normal volume today. Wouldn't it be nice if it ran up to $1.00 just because it's a security stock.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 645
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 05:32 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tycho, "security" stocks have been on a tear.

May be more than that but that is one possibility.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 435
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 04:11 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Up .05 on no news twenty minutes before the close today?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 635
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 11:43 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gabe, thank you. I finally found a positive in the recent financing deal.

Looks like in '03 SKVY paid $660K interest on Liabilities of AccPay = $2167K, STDebt= $1520K, other = 271K, and LTdebt = $260K for a total of $4218K. On the other side of the balance sheet they only had Cash = $210K, Rec = $1482K, Inv = $1855K, and other = $126K for a total of $3673.

So the $2.0 that they received at 8% will cost something like $160K in '04 saving them about $500K per year if that cash infusion allows them not to incur alot of other interest costs. I'm not sure that it will but it certainly helps.

Some other financial measures.

Approx $500K Free Cash Flow last year. Glad it is positive. Will be interesting to see how much IDSystems can add. Assuming the PR is accurate and EBITDA can be used as an approx proxy FCF might be close to $1200K this year.

Looks like there will be about 116M shares outstanding and more if IDSystems wins the lawsuit and another $1.0M is invested.

So at $.15 Market cap will be about $17400K or about 14.5 times FCF. Pretty expensive but this is a turnaround story.

I don't know, I think I will continue to watch and unless something changes drastically will hope to pick up some cheap shares around $.10-$.12
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 634
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 11:06 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gabe, I have seen you post previously about how the previous financing was bleeding them. I need to go back to the financials and see how much interest they were actually paying. They had gotten many vendors to take $.10 on the dollar and stock essentially valued at $.50. That was a good deal for stockholders IMO. It seems to me that this "financing" isn't such a bad deal (not as good as above) except that Murdoch (and associates) got way more than seems right and the dilution is very significant.



Like I said I may be overanalyzing it.



I own no pennies right now. Probably shoulda taken Bill up on HIET but....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 45
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 05:18 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer. The financing might have been overpriced, but it was a FAR better deal than the financing they had before!!! I think it will help them more than break even in the future.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 612
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2004 - 08:33 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hock, the problem that I have with SKVY releasing news like this is that they never release any kind of financial details. What kind of order level will this bring in? etc.

There have been many releases like this in the past yet revenues continue a slow slide. Granted SKVY has done well to align costs with revenue levels but will revenue ever climb as it must if greater prosperity is to be seen? IMO the dilution of the latest financing has SKVY way overpriced (particularly for what they got).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 3
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2004 - 08:34 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Some new news and a new customer (from what I can tell) for SKVY.


HAUPPAUGE, N.Y., April 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology
Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SKVY) announced today the installation of two
SmartTrack systems in a Home Depot distribution center located in Romeoville,
IL. Sentry's SmartTrack traveling CCTV system is ideally suited for big box
retail and distribution centers where many aisles of high shelving in large
facilities can cause line of site obstruction for conventional CCTV products.
SmartTrack has been a preferred solution for several of the world's largest
home centers including Lowe's Home Center, Reno Depot in Canada and B&Q in the
UK.
"Sentry is very pleased to add the world's largest retailer of home
improvement products as a SmartTrack customer," said Peter L. Murdoch,
President and CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation. "We are hopeful that this
first installation of SmartTrack at The Home Depot will lead to many more
opportunities. The trend for repeat business from first time SmartTrack buyers
has been very encouraging. Not only is our base of exceptional blue chip
customers growing steadily, Sentry continues to penetrate key accounts with
recent orders from both Target and Food Lion."
Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a
complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and
Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features
SentryVision(R), SmartTrack, a proprietary, patented traveling Surveillance
System. The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and
internal theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets
and people. The Company's partnership with Dialoc ID Holdings BV expands the
Company's product offering to include RFID and proximity Access Control
solutions. For further information please visit our website at
www.sentrytechnology.com.

This press release may include information that could constitute forward-
looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such forward-looking statements
may involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include
those matters disclosed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission
filings.

SOURCE Sentry Technology Corporation

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 538
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2004 - 07:37 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here are a couple posts that I posted on Raging Bull. The more I look at the deal, the more I dislike it. Essentially I think Murdoch negotiated very well and will get any windfall from the Checkpoint lawsuit with little or no downside.

As I understand it Saburah (Murdoch) acquires Dialoc's shares of Sentry and Dialoc's ID systems for consideration of $3.6M which includes assumption of debt and Saburah surrendering their 15% holdings of Dialoc.

Sentry then buys the above (including debt assumption IMO) from Saburah for $3.6M in Sentry shares.

From a cash (or cash equivalent point of view) Saburah gets $3.6M from Sentry in the form of Sentry shares (worth about $5.4M at today's prices) and has to pay $3.6M less whatever debt is assumed. I do not know what level of debt is being assumed. Could range from none or $3.6M. So if that is the case I say Saburah is getting a fine deal $5.4M for something between zero and $3.6M. The level of debt assumed is key IMO. That is what we do not know as far as I can tell.

I am not bashing. I am trying to understand the deal better. I owned Sentry from the time that I held SKV preferred shares (sometime in 1999) thru the down times up until the deal was announced and that day I sold my entire position (many would say measly 38K) at $.20.

I have been thru SKVY announced terms being clear as mud which cost me money before. I will not let it happen again. I figure it is a buy in the low $.teens but not at current prices.

Do you disagree with any of my assessment of how the deal was done above?



Saburah (Murdoch) did pay cash and assume debt totalling $3.6M to the Dutch for ID Systems. What I want to know is what the cash to debt ratio is? Do you know?

<<ALSO $1M more was invested to complete the deal:
ID Systems' management including Dr. Morton Roseman, President of CSI, and Peter Murdoch will invest $100,000 each to complete the proposed transaction between Saburah and Dialoc. Furst Capital Partners LLC and associates will invest $900,000 of equity in the combined transaction. >>

I am beginning to think that this might be the only cash that was used to complete the deal???!!!

>

I disagree here. That is/was my point. Right now I do not know how much cash/equity Murdoch had to part with. But he (thru Saburah) also gained interest in almost the entire windfall (90%) from the ID Systems lawsuit against Checkpoint! That by itself could more cover any losses incurred from his Sentry investment. That is what I think his goal was.


I did not mean to single you out. I did because you posted about reading the 10K. Many other investors probably have not even looked at it. I was trying to find another critical eye to figure/sound out the above issues in my mind. I am not trying to bash.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 40
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, March 19, 2004 - 06:20 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thank you!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 19
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, March 19, 2004 - 11:07 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well, the fact remains that the chart is showing somewhere north of .30 right now short term, but I will be happy with a nice Q to Q rise on positive earnings and news. But, if I wanted to get in before the run begins, I would not wait. JMHO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 523
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 09:01 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Blink and Gabe, my thoughts.

I'm not very good at the accounting side of research being "math challenged" (research is my forte). Can someone give insight into the financials of skvy going forward? From what they told me in the past, their previous financing kept them in business but was very "poisonous" to their bottom line. From what I'm piecing together ANYTHING is better and they should do well from now on. However, what is anyone's opinion on the shares outstanding vis a vis the financials and future prospects.

SKVY's (or should I call it Murdoch's) recent deal will certainly raise some much needed cash. I haven't exactly gone thru and added it all up but after paying outstanding debts there should be some cash left.

I should say that I was surprised they've merged with the Dutch at this point, although I know that was the intent all along. It leads me to believe they really have a good chance of getting a decent settlement judgement in their favour (or at least THEY think so). Any comments on the math side of this is VERY welcome. Full disclosure: My family has been hanging on to 120,000 shares (plus some trading profits).

In reality they haven't merged with Dialoc. Dialoc has gotten rid of their holdings to Murdoch via ID Systems and Saburah. Although the agreement still stands to cross market each others products. They did merge with Canadian ID Systems which is hard to find very much financial data on. As to the settlement with Checkpoint that was the real clincher IMO that made me sell my shares. This was ID systems biggest asset IMO. It now belongs to Murdoch nearly entirely. Only up to $1M can flow to the merged entity of SKVY and IDsystems. Some can also flow to Dialoc but Murdoch stands the most to gain personally.

I sold my 38K at $.20 on the day of the announcement. Would be interested again around $.12.


Hot off the press from the Sentry website:

Dear Sentry Shareholders;



In January 2004, Stores Magazine published a report prepared by Deloitte on the Top 200 Global Retailers. All of the top 6, 8 of the top 10 and 10 of the top 20 of the world's largest retailers are Sentry customers. Nine of the 10 Sentry customers listed in the top 20 grouping have purchased SmartTrack in the last 12 months, and are reference sites for future SmartTrack sales. Our customers on the top 20 list based on 2002 annual sales volume are:



1. Wal-Mart

2. Carrefour

3. Home Depot

4. Kroger

5. Metro

6. Target

8. Tesco

9. Costco

18. Walgreens

20. Lowe's



These customers in total had $628.9 billion in retail sales through thousands of individual locations. This group is the core of our strategy to grow SmartTrack business with key retail accounts.



Recently, we signed a term sheet to raise $2,000,000 in convertible securities with a major investor. We believe that the completion of this financing and the expected acquisition of ID Systems will provide us with the needed working capital to support and grow SmartTrack in the world's largest retailers.



With the continued support of our customers, employees, suppliers, and shareholders, we are confident of our future success.


Thanks for the update Blink. I hate to always be negative because I really try to be balanced. But what is new? These same corps have been customers for many years in most cases. Only Walmart and Carrefours are relatively new AFAIK.

Where are the sales? That is what it will take to turn SKVY into a profitable company which is what it will take to get the share price moving IMO.

BTW there are now 100M plus shares outstanding.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 38
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:11 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi guys,

I'm not very good at the accounting side of research being "math challenged" (research is my forte). Can someone give insight into the financials of skvy going forward? From what they told me in the past, their previous financing kept them in business but was very "poisonous" to their bottom line. From what I'm piecing together ANYTHING is better and they should do well from now on. However, what is anyone's opinion on the shares outstanding vis a vis the financials and future prospects.

I should say that I was surprised they've merged with the Dutch at this point, although I know that was the intent all along. It leads me to believe they really have a good chance of getting a decent settlement judgement in their favour (or at least THEY think so). Any comments on the math side of this is VERY welcome. Full disclosure: My family has been hanging on to 120,000 shares (plus some trading profits).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 18
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:02 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hot off the press from the Sentry website:

Dear Sentry Shareholders;



In January 2004, Stores Magazine published a report prepared by Deloitte on the Top 200 Global Retailers. All of the top 6, 8 of the top 10 and 10 of the top 20 of the world's largest retailers are Sentry customers. Nine of the 10 Sentry customers listed in the top 20 grouping have purchased SmartTrack in the last 12 months, and are reference sites for future SmartTrack sales. Our customers on the top 20 list based on 2002 annual sales volume are:



1. Wal-Mart

2. Carrefour

3. Home Depot

4. Kroger

5. Metro

6. Target

8. Tesco

9. Costco

18. Walgreens

20. Lowe's



These customers in total had $628.9 billion in retail sales through thousands of individual locations. This group is the core of our strategy to grow SmartTrack business with key retail accounts.



Recently, we signed a term sheet to raise $2,000,000 in convertible securities with a major investor. We believe that the completion of this financing and the expected acquisition of ID Systems will provide us with the needed working capital to support and grow SmartTrack in the world's largest retailers.



With the continued support of our customers, employees, suppliers, and shareholders, we are confident of our future success.




Sincerely,





Peter L. Murdoch

President and CEO

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 15
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 10:20 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer
Very interesting action this a.m. You don't think our conversation caused this do you?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 14
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 09:01 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer,
My guess as to why they aren't naming names has to do with the timing of the overall deal between Pete and Dialoc and ID Systems. Once all of that is cut and dry, we should get some better guidance on the issue. I don't know if it is Wal-Mart or not. The way they say it each time makes me wonder. "A Multi-billion dollar VC Fund"???
Whoever it is has an interest in Sentry at this point and that can only help. I just can't see Peter sinking that much of his own cash in to this venture without some assurances of making it big. I like the turnaround story, and I think .17 is fair as you say. If it does make it below the teens, I know there will be some large but orders.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 516
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 08:52 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Blink, that is definitely a positive, but why was the name of the VC Fund not named? I think I can be patient and wait as I would like to get the same (or better) pricing as teh VC fund. So far since the release it is about half way there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 12
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 08:47 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer
I think we are over-looking one key point that seems to keep coming up. This multi-billion dollar VC Fund. Who is it? My guess is that it is someone with an interest in what Sentry has to offer. If it is WalMart, which it could well be, then I think we have a homerun on our hands. If it is someone else, that is still good news. The VC Fund is getting a good share of stock so I think they will make sure we have orders coming in. If it is WalMart..........whoa!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 501
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 16, 2004 - 10:55 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Read the 10K and the recent changes in control are exactly as stated in the press release. Still a little muddy to me as to why this particular arrangement was chose. Backlog did not look promising either. They were not in compliance with borrowing covenants.


quote:

BACKLOG

Our backlog of orders was approximately $3.2 million at December 31, 2003, as
compared to approximately $5.2 million at December 31, 2002 and approximately
$6.0 million at December 31, 2001. We have noticed a trend, particularly with
our major customers, of receiving fewer long-term blanket orders than in the
past. We anticipate that substantially all of the backlog present as of
December 31, 2003 will be delivered within 12 months.

On March 22, 2002, the Company entered into a three-year revolving
line of credit and term loan with CIT for maximum borrowings of $8 million,
which are subject to certain limitations based on a percentage of eligible
accounts receivable and inventories as defined in the agreement. Interest on
the revolving line of credit is payable monthly at the JPMorgan Chase Bank prime
rate (4% at December 31, 2003), plus 2% per annum. The Company is required to
pay a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum on any unused portion of the credit
facility. Borrowings under the line are secured by substantially all of the
Company's assets. The terms of the agreement, among other matters, places
restrictions on capital expenditures and prohibits the payment of dividends. In
addition, the Company entered into a $100,000 term loan with CIT. The principal
was repaid to CIT in twelve equal monthly installments of $8,333, which began
May 1, 2002 and was paid in full on April 1, 2003. Interest on the term note
was at the JPMorgan Chase Bank prime plus 2.25%.

During 2003, CIT also provided the Company with an additional $300,000
over-advance facility. On December 8, 2003, the Company entered into a
Forbearance Agreement with CIT through December 8, 2004. CIT agreed to forbear
from (i) establishing additional availability reserves related to the inventory
advance percentage and (ii) demanding immediate payment of the overadvance. To
induce CIT not to take the forbearance actions, it was mutually agreed that the
maximum borrowings would be reduced from $8 million to $3 million and would
exclude eligible inventory from the borrowing base; the existing eligible
inventory loan of $845,000 would be converted into a term loan with payments of
$25,000 due in December 2003 and $10,000 per month thereafter; certain
limitations on eligible accounts receivable from a major customer would be
established and certain financial covenants would be established after June
2004. The Company had borrowings on the line of credit totaling $690,000 and
$2,034,000 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The balance on the
term loan was $825,000 at December 31, 2003.




(Message edited by killernut on March 16, 2004)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 455
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 11:00 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Same old, same old.

SKVY has done a wonderful job deeping existing customers and cutting costs. But have done horrible on a per share basis. Looks to me even with ID systems additional revenue SKVY at $.17 is trading at about a Price/Sales ratio of 1.0. Not bad if you can make money at that point. Unfortunately SKVY is just breakeven at that point.

What SKVY needs is to be able to increase sales. I've been saying that for 3 years. It has yet to happen. If/when they do it will be good for them and probably the stock price.

I am happy that I am out but would look to reenter around $.12. I think it may get there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 2
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 08:39 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Earnings are out and the PR looks pretty good.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 430
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 07:34 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Blink, I am patient. Hell I held some of this for 4 years. I am not jumping back in until I get more details on the deal and can more fully understand it. I think if I saw $.12 tomorrow or sometime soon I might reconsider. If it goes to $.30 it was a missed opportunity on my part. I just think the risk is greater than the potential reward at this point.

My money is just sitting there. Actually looking to either roll this into Gold Miners, SUncor, OXY, NXY or other.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 11
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 07:02 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

KillerNut
I am thinking you may have sold too soon. I don't want to see you lose out on an opportunity to get back in, but I also don't want this to go backwards. My feelings are that the share holders have a pretty strong hold on the stock at this level. If anyone comes along and wants several hundred thousand shares, they will have to pay up I'm afraid. At any rate, I hope you decide to get back in.

Do you have a limit order set somewhere?

I will sell you mine for a cool buck!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 37
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, February 27, 2004 - 10:31 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The past financing was very toxic for the company and kept them from being profitable for the year. I believe they ARE profitable for the quarter. I look on this as excellent news. This was the original plan, to fold the Dutch company into skvy as they were looking for a US public company to expand their horizons.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 10
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 02:57 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well, someone obviously thinks like me!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 9
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 02:02 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"In addition, the investment by the Company's senior managers and the expected investment by the major venture fund is a strong vote of confidence in the future of Sentry/ID Systems."

I wonder who the multi-Billion dollar VC Fund is? Does Wal-Mart have a VC?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 8
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:40 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"We expect this transaction will be very beneficial for Sentry shareholders," said Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation. "Sentry will acquire ID Systems, a profitable business generating 2003 EBITDA of approximately $700,000; obtain immediate financing of $2,000,000 from the VC Fund; enjoy future business opportunities through the VC Fund affiliates; and, receive financing of up to $1,000,000 following the successful conclusion of ID Canada's litigation against Checkpoint."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 7
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:35 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer
I know all about the one penny shares. I must say though I didn't start accumulating till .048. I am happy with Peter as you can tell, and I will let the price fall wherever the market sees fit. You are wise to cover as right now it's hard to tell what will come of this. If a large buyer sees the deal as good, we could easily go up quick. That's a speculation at this point. We shall see.
Good luck to you!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 409
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:25 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe the deal is better than I thought. Someone came and took the rest of my shares.

I am totally out for the first time in more than 4 years. Returns varied from 20% to 278% on my various lots.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 408
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:14 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Blink, I've been in as long term as anyone probably. Some (many) of my shares go back to 2000 purchases.

At current levels I have more than doubled. Remember at one point this truly traded at a penny!

Murdoch has done well to get the company to survive, but these terms may easily drive the price back below the $.teens.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 6
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:02 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer
The terms could put us in a range of .17 to .20 for a while. That's fine with me as I'm in a lot cheaper than that.

I am impressed with Peter and I trust him with my money. Short term you may be right. I'm in long term.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 407
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:55 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Blink, Still have about the same amount left.

I just think the price goes down short term because of the conversion terms.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 5
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:46 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Killer
I hope 20 was all you had. I like this deal very much. The $1,000,000 share buy deal looks nice. I think in the end after everyone has a chance to read closer, Peter will be thought of as a hero here. He is the one who has put this company back on its feet. You need to remember that he has put a lot of sweat capital in to this thing. I don't see him doing anything to hurt the investors.

JMO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 406
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:38 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Not halted. I got off 20K plus at $.20.

I just really dislike deals such as this where it isn't straightforward and looks like Murdoch may not be doing much for shareholders. I want to see where it settles out!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 405
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:34 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That is one complicated PR. It will take some time to understand all the implications and of course the SEC filings will be critical to understand the exact consequences. Overall I never felt that Dialoc helped SKVY that much other than the initial investment (and really screwed the SKV preferred holders!). Looks like Murdoch thinks he can make SKVY successful. I need to read it again (and again.)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 4
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:30 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It seems to me that Peter now owns SKVY. I think that's very good for shareholders. Peter must know something Diolac is unaware of. I'm all for this deal. RFID is going to be a big deal in the near term.

Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry and President of ID Systems, is the owner of Saburah. The price to be paid to Dialoc by Saburah and Murdoch for Sentry and ID Systems shares in cash, debt assumption and other consideration is approximately $3.6 million plus the surrender of Murdoch's 15% interest in Dialoc. Saburah has also agreed to make a substantial payment to Dialoc in the future equal to approximately 6% of any payment it receives from Checkpoint Systems Inc. resulting from litigation brought by ID Canada against Checkpoint. ID Canada is appealing the reduction of the original jury award of $79.2 million. The appeal is scheduled to be heard during the last week of March.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blink
Registered Member
Username: Blink

Post Number: 3
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:27 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Has trading been halted?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hockalugi
Registered Member
Username: Hockalugi

Post Number: 1
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:05 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Can some one with more knowledge than me make heads or tails of the PR released this morning please....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 303
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, February 23, 2004 - 12:05 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Speaking of charts:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SKVY.OB&t=1y
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 302
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, February 23, 2004 - 11:12 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SKVY's off the top of the chart this morning! .25 last time I looked.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 552
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 04:02 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tycho (OT) - Let's hope CALPERS doesn't go the way of EF Hutton...

...or, I should say, Super hopes it doesn't!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 227
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 03:10 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe that's why SKVY has been so strong this month. Is it EF Hutton I'd be paraphrasing if I said, "When CalPERS talks, people listen"?

Who was it who used to say that? Was it Hutton?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 226
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 03:03 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

K/N,

Wow, that is a surprise! As one of the million members of CalPERS, I've always felt that it's extremely well-managed.

Maybe this tells us more about SKVY than it does about CalPERS.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 272
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 09:56 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

CALPERs bought 300,000 + shares of SKVY in the Q ended 12-31-03. Unbelievable to me that an institution such as that would buy SKVY.

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/holdings.asp?mode=&kind=&symbol=DFC&symbol=DFIB&symbol =CHK&symbol=SKVY&symbol=LEND&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&FormType=In stitutional&mkttype=&pathname=&page=holdings&selected=SKVY
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 266
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:48 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SKVY settled alot of outstanding payments to vendors at $0.10 on the dollar and made up the rest with payment of stock valued at essentially $.50 per share.

They do need some financing and so far have only been able to get stop gap financing seemingly always at the last second. They say they are working on it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Public_heel
Moderator
Username: Public_heel

Post Number: 539
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:40 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What's the case for SKVY? They have negative working capital and are losing money. That's to be expected in a 19-cent stock, and a lot of these have had huge percentage moves on any kind of good news. It would seem they need to get some financing somehow, but I can't tell if they are even trying...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 264
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:21 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Holding on for now. Looking for $.50 but will settle for the $.30's.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 219
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 10:45 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SKVY hits .20 today! So what's everyone doing, holding . . . selling . . . buying more?

I think I'm going to hold.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 29
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 09:33 am:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

good for you!!! It looks like it's being accumulated. has behaved like a regular stock over the past few months. Hey, miracles DO happen!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 255
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 04:03 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Whohoo. It hit $.18 today. That is the point where I now have a 100% return.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 208
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 02:54 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Look at this! :-)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SKVY.OB&t=5d
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gabe144
Registered Member
Username: Gabe144

Post Number: 26
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, December 25, 2003 - 01:22 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I spoke with someone there a few weeks ago. It's amazing they survived this past year. In my opinion Mundy's done a masterful job of keeping customers and suppliers, cutting costs, and making arrangements that make a lot of sense to deal with the debt load they had. I was really impressed. He's not the kind of guy to hype...last year when I spoke to him he was very upfront about all their problems and I don't think HE expected the company to be still alive at this time!

Anyway, because they've cut costs and dealt with problems so well, they're in good stead to get some investment financing (the current stop-gap
measures are extortionalist in interest, but have kept them surviving).

They're certainly poised to do well IF they get financing. Until then, they are still struggling. They pay everything up front in cash. won't have credit till financing is in place.

They kept all their major clients through this and are supposed to do at least 25% of Lowes 150 new stores next year. Lowes is only using their
Smartrac and not sensimatic's version (in appropriate stores). They also have the foot in the door for Walmart and Target. Also, beginning to do well in Europe. But, forget the rfid (?) until the dutch resolves the appeal for that money they were awarded (at least another year of
litigation). Well, take it for what it's worth. I'm impressed that they've survived. They're lean enough to make it, depending on financing and the economy.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Killernut
Registered Member
Username: Killernut

Post Number: 163
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 19, 2003 - 02:47 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good news, I would say except it is probably only a tiny order. It is a foot in the door though.

I am convinced that SKVY has decent products and has done a good job on cost cutting, now they just need sales and more sales to generate profits! Nothing else is going to move SKVY out of the $.08 - .16 range IMO.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tychobrahe
Registered Member
Username: Tychobrahe

Post Number: 167
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 19, 2003 - 01:15 pm:   Edit Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wow! How 'bout this!

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031219/nyf010_1.html

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration