| Author |
Message |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 31 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 12:48 pm: |
|
Thanks. That makes sense. I was just surprised to see it at .046 (although on light volume) considering it has not been that low in a quite a while. I thought there may have been news out that I was unable to find and I know that this is the source to go to. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 3015 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 11:14 am: |
|
Hock - At the moment, it's down less than a penny, and less than one half of one percent of market cap has traded. I see that it got down to $0.046, but in a stock this small and this thin, it would be hard to get out of even a small position w/o moving it down that much. Looking at the T&S, it took only about $10k of trading to reach the low, and that trade at .046 was for only $230, and had trades at .060 on either side of it. (Message edited by public_heel on July 20, 2006) |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 30 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 10:22 am: |
|
Anyone know what happened today? I do not see any news on Reuters. |
   
Anonymous
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 - 07:54 am: |
|
killernut...thanks for the input. Question though Since when are stocks valued on revenue? I thought it was a crap shoot at best and you may even do better in Vegas. Revenues????? That's a new one. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 2967 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 05:59 pm: |
|
IMO, they need to do a reverse split (say 10:1), let the price come down to whatever it will and then it might be a buy. The truth of the matter is that it is way overvalued based on revenue (and any earnings) per share. |
   
edddddd Unregistered guest
| | Posted on Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 01:41 pm: |
|
Does anyone like the direction this company is moving? |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 173 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - 08:40 am: |
|
If the recent behavior of other cheap stocks in the security sector is any indication, SKVY will probably be at $5 by Friday... |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 24 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - 08:28 am: |
|
This PR just out. I am curious to see if/how the stock will trade today. RONKONKOMA, N.Y., July 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SKVY) announced today the installation of its SentryVision(R) SmartTrack traveling CCTV systems in Cape Town, South Africa on The Metro Rail Network to monitor passengers at the junction of bus, railway and taxi services. SmartTrack will be an integral part of an overall crime prevention and deterrence program including central management of all video devices over a network. The SmartTrack system uses patented technology to transmit video images from two pan, tilt and zoom cameras traveling along an aluminum rail mounted on the ceiling or wall of a passenger platform. The camera carriage travels at speeds of up to 13 feet per second and provides unobstructed views of passenger activity that is not possible with conventional camera systems. SmartTrack was supplied through Pentagon Distribution, Sentry Technology's South African distribution partner. "We are pleased to have SmartTrack included as an important component in public transportation security," said Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation. "There are many other applications where our proprietary traveling CCTV technology can be applied to help secure public spaces. The successful installation of SmartTrack on rail platforms in South Africa marks the beginning of our campaign to solicit business through the many consulting firms and government agencies in the U.S. involved in Homeland Security." Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features the proprietary SentryVision(R) SmartTrack patented traveling Surveillance System. The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and internal theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets and people. The Company's acquisition of ID Systems expands the Company's product offering to include proximity Access Control and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) solutions. For further information, please visit our website at http://www.sentrytechnology.com. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 2380 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 13, 2005 - 05:48 pm: |
|
SKVY Q1 out. Lowes loss really hurts. Back to losing money. glad I avoided it. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 2293 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 31, 2005 - 03:31 pm: |
|
Q4 and 04 results out. http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050331/nyth168.html?.v=3 Not horrible, not great, but confirmation that going forward the Lowe's loss will hurt. Those that took profits above $.20 did well. May see a small pop on results but I would guess it will drift down going forward. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 2238 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 04:47 pm: |
|
I haven't looked too closely lately but I don't think much has changed. I think the $.10 area is attractive. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 1564 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 04:21 pm: |
|
K/N, As you recently said on another board, "I suck at trading." Well, I don't just suck, I nibble. :-) It seems that I made a pretty nifty trade on this one though.(in at .07, out at .24) Now I'm wondering if it might not be getting close to buying territory again. I see it's currently at .145. You have said that you might be interested at .10. Do you have any current thoughts on this thing? |
   
Bodega_bill
Registered Member Username: Bodega_bill
Post Number: 175 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - 07:19 pm: |
|
I got rode out of town on this one. Saw the price dropping and bailed 25k at .18 the next day it hits .27-----------shit. I still think the news was awful, they lost their biggest customer as far as service goes and the stock goes up because they are changing the name and consolidating different divisions, so what. I doubt if they make money (profit) this period because of the loss of the Lowes account. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 1423 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - 11:39 am: |
|
What a wild ride this SKVY has been these last couple of days; down midday yesterday to below .16, then back to .21 just before the close, and now up .04 to .25 this morning! Just for the hell of it, I just put in an order to sell at .26. (Well, stranger things have happened! :-)) |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 1998 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 03, 2005 - 04:50 pm: |
|
Tycho, I had buy orders in at $.11 and one day (or more maybe) it traded down below that but I never got any. I personally think it may be near a time to take profits but think you may be able to get a bit more if you hold on. Mid $.2X's seem to be old resistance and I would wait to see if it gets that high or maybe even break thru that high. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 1372 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 03, 2005 - 03:37 pm: |
|
Anyone noticing what this one's been doing since mid-December? A good time to take profits or only the beginning of a bigger move? |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 1781 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, November 15, 2004 - 01:20 pm: |
|
$40K net profit for the quarter on great revenue? Looks like the stock price likes it but if I had been able to grab any near the $.10 I would be selling. |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 17 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Monday, November 15, 2004 - 12:41 pm: |
|
Earnings are out for SKVY and look pretty good. |
   
Anonymous
| | Posted on Friday, October 22, 2004 - 05:09 pm: |
|
What is everyone thinking about the possibility of a buyout from ADT here? Looks like it may happen. I think that is what everyone is hoping for. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 1326 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, August 16, 2004 - 10:12 pm: |
|
I looked briefly. I think they might be able to maintain marginal profitibility. But they would need to have a huge improvement in net profitibility to ever have anything other than a astronomical PE. That aside I think it is a buy if you can get it for ten or eleven cents. |
   
Bodega_bill
Registered Member Username: Bodega_bill
Post Number: 128 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, August 16, 2004 - 09:12 pm: |
|
Any thoughts on the quarter? Looks like the corner might have been turned. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 1305 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 09:46 am: |
|
I had a buy order in at $.11 for 50K shares and got none on the recent downdraft. |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 12 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 09:07 am: |
|
Any thoughts on the recent action? |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 11 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Friday, June 25, 2004 - 01:36 pm: |
|
Sentry Technology Corporation CEO Interviewed By CEOcast 25 June 2004, 1:13pm ET RONKONKOMA, N.Y., June 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology Corporation (BB:SKVY) announced today that Peter L. Murdoch, President & CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation, was interviewed by Ken Sgrow of CEOcast. CEOcast is the premier source of original and syndicated streaming broadcast interviews of Chief Executive Officers at public and private news- making companies. Organized by industry, its analysts average over 15 years experience covering and evaluating Wall Street's leading companies. Today's interview focuses on Sentry's restructuring, turnaround and current marketing plans that are producing positive results for the Company. The entire interview can be heard at http://www.ceocast.com . Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features the SentryVision(R) SmartTrack system, a proprietary, patented traveling Surveillance System. The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and internal theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets and people. The Company's acquisition of ID Systems expands the Company's product offering to include library security and management tools, proximity Access Control and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) solutions. For further information, please visit our website at http://www.sentrytechnology.com . This press release may include information that could constitute forward- looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such forward-looking statements may involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those matters disclosed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings. SOURCE Sentry Technology Corporation -0- 06/25/2004 /CONTACT: Peter Murdoch, President & CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation, +1-631-739-2000 / /Company News On-Call:
|
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 2253 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 04:11 pm: |
|
Sorry - I meant that "floorlesses" are a subset of "toxics", not the other way around. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 2252 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 04:09 pm: |
|
On 5/4, Brasscan bought 16.6m shares at .12, and 5m warrants at .15, giving them an immediate paper profit of $2.5m |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 884 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:48 pm: |
|
Gotcha. and like I said I need to check the .12 per share. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 2250 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:40 pm: |
|
K/N - you're referring to "floorless", as far as I know. "Toxics" would be any case where the buyers of the converts could short the stock on the market at the same time they bought and lock in their profit. "Toxics" would thus be a subset of "floorlesses", though not nearly as insidious, as the convert buyers would not profit from a downward spiral in the price. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 882 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:28 pm: |
|
I always thought that toxic referred to the fact that the conversion would be set at a floating price as opposed to a set price. Anyway I need to go back and look because some of the details are cloudy to me and all I remember was I figured $.10-$.12 would be a good place to buy. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 2249 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 03:11 pm: |
|
If they were .12 per share, they were toxic when sold, and even more toxic now. I guess the important thing is that SKVY gets the $2m, but the relative toxicity of the converts would be a comment on the buyer's faith in the company's future... |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 880 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:37 pm: |
|
PH, not toxic but I think they are priced at $.12 per share. I think the new 10K will shed some more light. I have been waiting. |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 9 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:28 pm: |
|
I unfortunately do not know how to even begin to look at how the financing was completed, but I am sure that Killernut would know. I have been owning this stock since it was mentioned on the old 11wall, and plan on holding most of my shares for a while longer. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 2247 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:18 pm: |
|
It looks like they are doing OK, especially with positive developments after the quarter closed. Do you know if that Brasco financing was done with toxic converts, by any chance? |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 8 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Friday, May 14, 2004 - 02:00 pm: |
|
SKVY just reported earnings. It seems like they are on the right track. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 800 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 10:22 am: |
|
My thoughts on Brascan range from the great to the not so great. Seems as if Brascan might really like what SKVY offers and this would bode well for SKVY. My concern (and I'm still digging) is that the managers of the Technology Fund may have previous connections with Murcoch which might not be in the common shareholders best interest. I expect SKVY to remain volatile. I really want to read the SEC filings on the deal. I don't think they have been posted. (I could be wrong on that.) I will not change my mind until I do that. So for now I stay out. |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 7 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 10:06 am: |
|
Killernut, I have been on vacation for the last few weeks and just saw the news on SKVY and the financing. Do you think that this is a good think for the long-term? It seems like there are a lot of people putting trust and money into SKVY for the future. Thanks as always, Hock-a-lugi |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 793 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, May 05, 2004 - 03:39 pm: |
|
Some info on the Brascan Technology Fund which recently closed the $2M financing deal with SKVY. Looks like it is not a typical industry for them to invest in, but it also looks like they tied up some 5% of their capital in the SKVY investment. http://www.brascanam.com/Alternative/opportunity.htm |
   
Jfh
Moderator Username: Jfh
Post Number: 634 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2004 - 04:28 pm: |
|
Gabe: Gap says he didn't sabotage the threads, see "Technology" and "Medical" stocks. You should be proud of him |
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 46 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, April 16, 2004 - 06:14 pm: |
|
Thanks for the feedback. I'd be happy if they were bought out at .75!! |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 445 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, April 15, 2004 - 11:50 am: |
|
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=skvy.ob |
   
Tree_sloth
Registered Member Username: Tree_sloth
Post Number: 412 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 11:05 pm: |
|
Also it had four times the normal volume today. Wouldn't it be nice if it ran up to $1.00 just because it's a security stock. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 645 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 05:32 pm: |
|
Tycho, "security" stocks have been on a tear. May be more than that but that is one possibility. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 435 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 04:11 pm: |
|
Up .05 on no news twenty minutes before the close today? |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 635 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 11:43 pm: |
|
Gabe, thank you. I finally found a positive in the recent financing deal. Looks like in '03 SKVY paid $660K interest on Liabilities of AccPay = $2167K, STDebt= $1520K, other = 271K, and LTdebt = $260K for a total of $4218K. On the other side of the balance sheet they only had Cash = $210K, Rec = $1482K, Inv = $1855K, and other = $126K for a total of $3673. So the $2.0 that they received at 8% will cost something like $160K in '04 saving them about $500K per year if that cash infusion allows them not to incur alot of other interest costs. I'm not sure that it will but it certainly helps. Some other financial measures. Approx $500K Free Cash Flow last year. Glad it is positive. Will be interesting to see how much IDSystems can add. Assuming the PR is accurate and EBITDA can be used as an approx proxy FCF might be close to $1200K this year. Looks like there will be about 116M shares outstanding and more if IDSystems wins the lawsuit and another $1.0M is invested. So at $.15 Market cap will be about $17400K or about 14.5 times FCF. Pretty expensive but this is a turnaround story. I don't know, I think I will continue to watch and unless something changes drastically will hope to pick up some cheap shares around $.10-$.12 |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 634 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 11:06 pm: |
|
Gabe, I have seen you post previously about how the previous financing was bleeding them. I need to go back to the financials and see how much interest they were actually paying. They had gotten many vendors to take $.10 on the dollar and stock essentially valued at $.50. That was a good deal for stockholders IMO. It seems to me that this "financing" isn't such a bad deal (not as good as above) except that Murdoch (and associates) got way more than seems right and the dilution is very significant. Like I said I may be overanalyzing it. I own no pennies right now. Probably shoulda taken Bill up on HIET but.... |
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 45 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 05:18 pm: |
|
Killer. The financing might have been overpriced, but it was a FAR better deal than the financing they had before!!! I think it will help them more than break even in the future. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 612 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2004 - 08:33 pm: |
|
Hock, the problem that I have with SKVY releasing news like this is that they never release any kind of financial details. What kind of order level will this bring in? etc. There have been many releases like this in the past yet revenues continue a slow slide. Granted SKVY has done well to align costs with revenue levels but will revenue ever climb as it must if greater prosperity is to be seen? IMO the dilution of the latest financing has SKVY way overpriced (particularly for what they got). |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 3 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2004 - 08:34 am: |
|
Some new news and a new customer (from what I can tell) for SKVY. HAUPPAUGE, N.Y., April 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sentry Technology Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SKVY) announced today the installation of two SmartTrack systems in a Home Depot distribution center located in Romeoville, IL. Sentry's SmartTrack traveling CCTV system is ideally suited for big box retail and distribution centers where many aisles of high shelving in large facilities can cause line of site obstruction for conventional CCTV products. SmartTrack has been a preferred solution for several of the world's largest home centers including Lowe's Home Center, Reno Depot in Canada and B&Q in the UK. "Sentry is very pleased to add the world's largest retailer of home improvement products as a SmartTrack customer," said Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation. "We are hopeful that this first installation of SmartTrack at The Home Depot will lead to many more opportunities. The trend for repeat business from first time SmartTrack buyers has been very encouraging. Not only is our base of exceptional blue chip customers growing steadily, Sentry continues to penetrate key accounts with recent orders from both Target and Food Lion." Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs a complete line of Radio Frequency (RF) and Electro-Magnetic (EM) EAS systems and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions. The CCTV product line features SentryVision(R), SmartTrack, a proprietary, patented traveling Surveillance System. The Company's products are used by retailers to deter shoplifting and internal theft and by industrial and institutional customers to protect assets and people. The Company's partnership with Dialoc ID Holdings BV expands the Company's product offering to include RFID and proximity Access Control solutions. For further information please visit our website at www.sentrytechnology.com. This press release may include information that could constitute forward- looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such forward-looking statements may involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those matters disclosed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings. SOURCE Sentry Technology Corporation
|
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 538 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2004 - 07:37 pm: |
|
Here are a couple posts that I posted on Raging Bull. The more I look at the deal, the more I dislike it. Essentially I think Murdoch negotiated very well and will get any windfall from the Checkpoint lawsuit with little or no downside. As I understand it Saburah (Murdoch) acquires Dialoc's shares of Sentry and Dialoc's ID systems for consideration of $3.6M which includes assumption of debt and Saburah surrendering their 15% holdings of Dialoc. Sentry then buys the above (including debt assumption IMO) from Saburah for $3.6M in Sentry shares. From a cash (or cash equivalent point of view) Saburah gets $3.6M from Sentry in the form of Sentry shares (worth about $5.4M at today's prices) and has to pay $3.6M less whatever debt is assumed. I do not know what level of debt is being assumed. Could range from none or $3.6M. So if that is the case I say Saburah is getting a fine deal $5.4M for something between zero and $3.6M. The level of debt assumed is key IMO. That is what we do not know as far as I can tell. I am not bashing. I am trying to understand the deal better. I owned Sentry from the time that I held SKV preferred shares (sometime in 1999) thru the down times up until the deal was announced and that day I sold my entire position (many would say measly 38K) at $.20. I have been thru SKVY announced terms being clear as mud which cost me money before. I will not let it happen again. I figure it is a buy in the low $.teens but not at current prices. Do you disagree with any of my assessment of how the deal was done above? Saburah (Murdoch) did pay cash and assume debt totalling $3.6M to the Dutch for ID Systems. What I want to know is what the cash to debt ratio is? Do you know? <<ALSO $1M more was invested to complete the deal: ID Systems' management including Dr. Morton Roseman, President of CSI, and Peter Murdoch will invest $100,000 each to complete the proposed transaction between Saburah and Dialoc. Furst Capital Partners LLC and associates will invest $900,000 of equity in the combined transaction. >> I am beginning to think that this might be the only cash that was used to complete the deal???!!! > I disagree here. That is/was my point. Right now I do not know how much cash/equity Murdoch had to part with. But he (thru Saburah) also gained interest in almost the entire windfall (90%) from the ID Systems lawsuit against Checkpoint! That by itself could more cover any losses incurred from his Sentry investment. That is what I think his goal was. I did not mean to single you out. I did because you posted about reading the 10K. Many other investors probably have not even looked at it. I was trying to find another critical eye to figure/sound out the above issues in my mind. I am not trying to bash.
|
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 40 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, March 19, 2004 - 06:20 pm: |
|
Thank you! |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 19 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Friday, March 19, 2004 - 11:07 am: |
|
Well, the fact remains that the chart is showing somewhere north of .30 right now short term, but I will be happy with a nice Q to Q rise on positive earnings and news. But, if I wanted to get in before the run begins, I would not wait. JMHO |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 523 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 09:01 pm: |
|
Blink and Gabe, my thoughts. I'm not very good at the accounting side of research being "math challenged" (research is my forte). Can someone give insight into the financials of skvy going forward? From what they told me in the past, their previous financing kept them in business but was very "poisonous" to their bottom line. From what I'm piecing together ANYTHING is better and they should do well from now on. However, what is anyone's opinion on the shares outstanding vis a vis the financials and future prospects. SKVY's (or should I call it Murdoch's) recent deal will certainly raise some much needed cash. I haven't exactly gone thru and added it all up but after paying outstanding debts there should be some cash left. I should say that I was surprised they've merged with the Dutch at this point, although I know that was the intent all along. It leads me to believe they really have a good chance of getting a decent settlement judgement in their favour (or at least THEY think so). Any comments on the math side of this is VERY welcome. Full disclosure: My family has been hanging on to 120,000 shares (plus some trading profits). In reality they haven't merged with Dialoc. Dialoc has gotten rid of their holdings to Murdoch via ID Systems and Saburah. Although the agreement still stands to cross market each others products. They did merge with Canadian ID Systems which is hard to find very much financial data on. As to the settlement with Checkpoint that was the real clincher IMO that made me sell my shares. This was ID systems biggest asset IMO. It now belongs to Murdoch nearly entirely. Only up to $1M can flow to the merged entity of SKVY and IDsystems. Some can also flow to Dialoc but Murdoch stands the most to gain personally. I sold my 38K at $.20 on the day of the announcement. Would be interested again around $.12. Hot off the press from the Sentry website: Dear Sentry Shareholders; In January 2004, Stores Magazine published a report prepared by Deloitte on the Top 200 Global Retailers. All of the top 6, 8 of the top 10 and 10 of the top 20 of the world's largest retailers are Sentry customers. Nine of the 10 Sentry customers listed in the top 20 grouping have purchased SmartTrack in the last 12 months, and are reference sites for future SmartTrack sales. Our customers on the top 20 list based on 2002 annual sales volume are: 1. Wal-Mart 2. Carrefour 3. Home Depot 4. Kroger 5. Metro 6. Target 8. Tesco 9. Costco 18. Walgreens 20. Lowe's These customers in total had $628.9 billion in retail sales through thousands of individual locations. This group is the core of our strategy to grow SmartTrack business with key retail accounts. Recently, we signed a term sheet to raise $2,000,000 in convertible securities with a major investor. We believe that the completion of this financing and the expected acquisition of ID Systems will provide us with the needed working capital to support and grow SmartTrack in the world's largest retailers. With the continued support of our customers, employees, suppliers, and shareholders, we are confident of our future success. Thanks for the update Blink. I hate to always be negative because I really try to be balanced. But what is new? These same corps have been customers for many years in most cases. Only Walmart and Carrefours are relatively new AFAIK. Where are the sales? That is what it will take to turn SKVY into a profitable company which is what it will take to get the share price moving IMO. BTW there are now 100M plus shares outstanding.
|
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 38 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:11 pm: |
|
Hi guys, I'm not very good at the accounting side of research being "math challenged" (research is my forte). Can someone give insight into the financials of skvy going forward? From what they told me in the past, their previous financing kept them in business but was very "poisonous" to their bottom line. From what I'm piecing together ANYTHING is better and they should do well from now on. However, what is anyone's opinion on the shares outstanding vis a vis the financials and future prospects. I should say that I was surprised they've merged with the Dutch at this point, although I know that was the intent all along. It leads me to believe they really have a good chance of getting a decent settlement judgement in their favour (or at least THEY think so). Any comments on the math side of this is VERY welcome. Full disclosure: My family has been hanging on to 120,000 shares (plus some trading profits). |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 18 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:02 pm: |
|
Hot off the press from the Sentry website: Dear Sentry Shareholders; In January 2004, Stores Magazine published a report prepared by Deloitte on the Top 200 Global Retailers. All of the top 6, 8 of the top 10 and 10 of the top 20 of the world's largest retailers are Sentry customers. Nine of the 10 Sentry customers listed in the top 20 grouping have purchased SmartTrack in the last 12 months, and are reference sites for future SmartTrack sales. Our customers on the top 20 list based on 2002 annual sales volume are: 1. Wal-Mart 2. Carrefour 3. Home Depot 4. Kroger 5. Metro 6. Target 8. Tesco 9. Costco 18. Walgreens 20. Lowe's These customers in total had $628.9 billion in retail sales through thousands of individual locations. This group is the core of our strategy to grow SmartTrack business with key retail accounts. Recently, we signed a term sheet to raise $2,000,000 in convertible securities with a major investor. We believe that the completion of this financing and the expected acquisition of ID Systems will provide us with the needed working capital to support and grow SmartTrack in the world's largest retailers. With the continued support of our customers, employees, suppliers, and shareholders, we are confident of our future success. Sincerely, Peter L. Murdoch President and CEO
|
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 15 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 10:20 am: |
|
Killer Very interesting action this a.m. You don't think our conversation caused this do you? |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 14 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 09:01 am: |
|
Killer, My guess as to why they aren't naming names has to do with the timing of the overall deal between Pete and Dialoc and ID Systems. Once all of that is cut and dry, we should get some better guidance on the issue. I don't know if it is Wal-Mart or not. The way they say it each time makes me wonder. "A Multi-billion dollar VC Fund"??? Whoever it is has an interest in Sentry at this point and that can only help. I just can't see Peter sinking that much of his own cash in to this venture without some assurances of making it big. I like the turnaround story, and I think .17 is fair as you say. If it does make it below the teens, I know there will be some large but orders. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 516 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 08:52 am: |
|
Blink, that is definitely a positive, but why was the name of the VC Fund not named? I think I can be patient and wait as I would like to get the same (or better) pricing as teh VC fund. So far since the release it is about half way there. |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 12 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 08:47 am: |
|
Killer I think we are over-looking one key point that seems to keep coming up. This multi-billion dollar VC Fund. Who is it? My guess is that it is someone with an interest in what Sentry has to offer. If it is WalMart, which it could well be, then I think we have a homerun on our hands. If it is someone else, that is still good news. The VC Fund is getting a good share of stock so I think they will make sure we have orders coming in. If it is WalMart..........whoa! |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 501 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 16, 2004 - 10:55 pm: |
|
Read the 10K and the recent changes in control are exactly as stated in the press release. Still a little muddy to me as to why this particular arrangement was chose. Backlog did not look promising either. They were not in compliance with borrowing covenants.
quote:BACKLOG Our backlog of orders was approximately $3.2 million at December 31, 2003, as compared to approximately $5.2 million at December 31, 2002 and approximately $6.0 million at December 31, 2001. We have noticed a trend, particularly with our major customers, of receiving fewer long-term blanket orders than in the past. We anticipate that substantially all of the backlog present as of December 31, 2003 will be delivered within 12 months. On March 22, 2002, the Company entered into a three-year revolving line of credit and term loan with CIT for maximum borrowings of $8 million, which are subject to certain limitations based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventories as defined in the agreement. Interest on the revolving line of credit is payable monthly at the JPMorgan Chase Bank prime rate (4% at December 31, 2003), plus 2% per annum. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum on any unused portion of the credit facility. Borrowings under the line are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets. The terms of the agreement, among other matters, places restrictions on capital expenditures and prohibits the payment of dividends. In addition, the Company entered into a $100,000 term loan with CIT. The principal was repaid to CIT in twelve equal monthly installments of $8,333, which began May 1, 2002 and was paid in full on April 1, 2003. Interest on the term note was at the JPMorgan Chase Bank prime plus 2.25%. During 2003, CIT also provided the Company with an additional $300,000 over-advance facility. On December 8, 2003, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with CIT through December 8, 2004. CIT agreed to forbear from (i) establishing additional availability reserves related to the inventory advance percentage and (ii) demanding immediate payment of the overadvance. To induce CIT not to take the forbearance actions, it was mutually agreed that the maximum borrowings would be reduced from $8 million to $3 million and would exclude eligible inventory from the borrowing base; the existing eligible inventory loan of $845,000 would be converted into a term loan with payments of $25,000 due in December 2003 and $10,000 per month thereafter; certain limitations on eligible accounts receivable from a major customer would be established and certain financial covenants would be established after June 2004. The Company had borrowings on the line of credit totaling $690,000 and $2,034,000 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The balance on the term loan was $825,000 at December 31, 2003.
(Message edited by killernut on March 16, 2004) |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 455 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 11:00 am: |
|
Same old, same old. SKVY has done a wonderful job deeping existing customers and cutting costs. But have done horrible on a per share basis. Looks to me even with ID systems additional revenue SKVY at $.17 is trading at about a Price/Sales ratio of 1.0. Not bad if you can make money at that point. Unfortunately SKVY is just breakeven at that point. What SKVY needs is to be able to increase sales. I've been saying that for 3 years. It has yet to happen. If/when they do it will be good for them and probably the stock price. I am happy that I am out but would look to reenter around $.12. I think it may get there. |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 2 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 08:39 am: |
|
Earnings are out and the PR looks pretty good. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 430 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 07:34 pm: |
|
Blink, I am patient. Hell I held some of this for 4 years. I am not jumping back in until I get more details on the deal and can more fully understand it. I think if I saw $.12 tomorrow or sometime soon I might reconsider. If it goes to $.30 it was a missed opportunity on my part. I just think the risk is greater than the potential reward at this point. My money is just sitting there. Actually looking to either roll this into Gold Miners, SUncor, OXY, NXY or other. |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 11 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 07:02 pm: |
|
KillerNut I am thinking you may have sold too soon. I don't want to see you lose out on an opportunity to get back in, but I also don't want this to go backwards. My feelings are that the share holders have a pretty strong hold on the stock at this level. If anyone comes along and wants several hundred thousand shares, they will have to pay up I'm afraid. At any rate, I hope you decide to get back in. Do you have a limit order set somewhere? I will sell you mine for a cool buck! |
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 37 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, February 27, 2004 - 10:31 am: |
|
The past financing was very toxic for the company and kept them from being profitable for the year. I believe they ARE profitable for the quarter. I look on this as excellent news. This was the original plan, to fold the Dutch company into skvy as they were looking for a US public company to expand their horizons. |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 10 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 02:57 pm: |
|
Well, someone obviously thinks like me!!! |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 9 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 02:02 pm: |
|
"In addition, the investment by the Company's senior managers and the expected investment by the major venture fund is a strong vote of confidence in the future of Sentry/ID Systems." I wonder who the multi-Billion dollar VC Fund is? Does Wal-Mart have a VC? |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 8 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:40 pm: |
|
"We expect this transaction will be very beneficial for Sentry shareholders," said Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry Technology Corporation. "Sentry will acquire ID Systems, a profitable business generating 2003 EBITDA of approximately $700,000; obtain immediate financing of $2,000,000 from the VC Fund; enjoy future business opportunities through the VC Fund affiliates; and, receive financing of up to $1,000,000 following the successful conclusion of ID Canada's litigation against Checkpoint." |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 7 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:35 pm: |
|
Killer I know all about the one penny shares. I must say though I didn't start accumulating till .048. I am happy with Peter as you can tell, and I will let the price fall wherever the market sees fit. You are wise to cover as right now it's hard to tell what will come of this. If a large buyer sees the deal as good, we could easily go up quick. That's a speculation at this point. We shall see. Good luck to you! |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 409 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:25 pm: |
|
Maybe the deal is better than I thought. Someone came and took the rest of my shares. I am totally out for the first time in more than 4 years. Returns varied from 20% to 278% on my various lots. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 408 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:14 pm: |
|
Blink, I've been in as long term as anyone probably. Some (many) of my shares go back to 2000 purchases. At current levels I have more than doubled. Remember at one point this truly traded at a penny! Murdoch has done well to get the company to survive, but these terms may easily drive the price back below the $.teens. |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 6 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 01:02 pm: |
|
Killer The terms could put us in a range of .17 to .20 for a while. That's fine with me as I'm in a lot cheaper than that. I am impressed with Peter and I trust him with my money. Short term you may be right. I'm in long term. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 407 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:55 pm: |
|
Blink, Still have about the same amount left. I just think the price goes down short term because of the conversion terms. |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 5 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:46 pm: |
|
Killer I hope 20 was all you had. I like this deal very much. The $1,000,000 share buy deal looks nice. I think in the end after everyone has a chance to read closer, Peter will be thought of as a hero here. He is the one who has put this company back on its feet. You need to remember that he has put a lot of sweat capital in to this thing. I don't see him doing anything to hurt the investors. JMO |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 406 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:38 pm: |
|
Not halted. I got off 20K plus at $.20. I just really dislike deals such as this where it isn't straightforward and looks like Murdoch may not be doing much for shareholders. I want to see where it settles out! |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 405 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:34 pm: |
|
That is one complicated PR. It will take some time to understand all the implications and of course the SEC filings will be critical to understand the exact consequences. Overall I never felt that Dialoc helped SKVY that much other than the initial investment (and really screwed the SKV preferred holders!). Looks like Murdoch thinks he can make SKVY successful. I need to read it again (and again.) |
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 4 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:30 pm: |
|
It seems to me that Peter now owns SKVY. I think that's very good for shareholders. Peter must know something Diolac is unaware of. I'm all for this deal. RFID is going to be a big deal in the near term. Peter L. Murdoch, President and CEO of Sentry and President of ID Systems, is the owner of Saburah. The price to be paid to Dialoc by Saburah and Murdoch for Sentry and ID Systems shares in cash, debt assumption and other consideration is approximately $3.6 million plus the surrender of Murdoch's 15% interest in Dialoc. Saburah has also agreed to make a substantial payment to Dialoc in the future equal to approximately 6% of any payment it receives from Checkpoint Systems Inc. resulting from litigation brought by ID Canada against Checkpoint. ID Canada is appealing the reduction of the original jury award of $79.2 million. The appeal is scheduled to be heard during the last week of March.
|
   
Blink
Registered Member Username: Blink
Post Number: 3 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:27 pm: |
|
Has trading been halted? |
   
Hockalugi
Registered Member Username: Hockalugi
Post Number: 1 Registered: 02-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 12:05 pm: |
|
Can some one with more knowledge than me make heads or tails of the PR released this morning please.... |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 303 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, February 23, 2004 - 12:05 pm: |
|
Speaking of charts: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SKVY.OB&t=1y |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 302 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, February 23, 2004 - 11:12 am: |
|
SKVY's off the top of the chart this morning! .25 last time I looked. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 552 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 04:02 pm: |
|
Tycho (OT) - Let's hope CALPERS doesn't go the way of EF Hutton... ...or, I should say, Super hopes it doesn't! |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 227 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 03:10 pm: |
|
Maybe that's why SKVY has been so strong this month. Is it EF Hutton I'd be paraphrasing if I said, "When CalPERS talks, people listen"? Who was it who used to say that? Was it Hutton? |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 226 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 03:03 pm: |
|
K/N, Wow, that is a surprise! As one of the million members of CalPERS, I've always felt that it's extremely well-managed. Maybe this tells us more about SKVY than it does about CalPERS. |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 272 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 09:56 am: |
|
CALPERs bought 300,000 + shares of SKVY in the Q ended 12-31-03. Unbelievable to me that an institution such as that would buy SKVY. http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/holdings.asp?mode=&kind=&symbol=DFC&symbol=DFIB&symbol =CHK&symbol=SKVY&symbol=LEND&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&FormType=In stitutional&mkttype=&pathname=&page=holdings&selected=SKVY |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 266 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:48 am: |
|
SKVY settled alot of outstanding payments to vendors at $0.10 on the dollar and made up the rest with payment of stock valued at essentially $.50 per share. They do need some financing and so far have only been able to get stop gap financing seemingly always at the last second. They say they are working on it. |
   
Public_heel
Moderator Username: Public_heel
Post Number: 539 Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:40 am: |
|
What's the case for SKVY? They have negative working capital and are losing money. That's to be expected in a 19-cent stock, and a lot of these have had huge percentage moves on any kind of good news. It would seem they need to get some financing somehow, but I can't tell if they are even trying... |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 264 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 11:21 am: |
|
Holding on for now. Looking for $.50 but will settle for the $.30's. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 219 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 10:45 am: |
|
SKVY hits .20 today! So what's everyone doing, holding . . . selling . . . buying more? I think I'm going to hold. |
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 29 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 09:33 am: |
|
good for you!!! It looks like it's being accumulated. has behaved like a regular stock over the past few months. Hey, miracles DO happen! |
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 255 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 04:03 pm: |
|
Whohoo. It hit $.18 today. That is the point where I now have a 100% return. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 208 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 02:54 pm: |
|
Look at this! :-) http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SKVY.OB&t=5d |
   
Gabe144
Registered Member Username: Gabe144
Post Number: 26 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, December 25, 2003 - 01:22 pm: |
|
I spoke with someone there a few weeks ago. It's amazing they survived this past year. In my opinion Mundy's done a masterful job of keeping customers and suppliers, cutting costs, and making arrangements that make a lot of sense to deal with the debt load they had. I was really impressed. He's not the kind of guy to hype...last year when I spoke to him he was very upfront about all their problems and I don't think HE expected the company to be still alive at this time! Anyway, because they've cut costs and dealt with problems so well, they're in good stead to get some investment financing (the current stop-gap measures are extortionalist in interest, but have kept them surviving). They're certainly poised to do well IF they get financing. Until then, they are still struggling. They pay everything up front in cash. won't have credit till financing is in place. They kept all their major clients through this and are supposed to do at least 25% of Lowes 150 new stores next year. Lowes is only using their Smartrac and not sensimatic's version (in appropriate stores). They also have the foot in the door for Walmart and Target. Also, beginning to do well in Europe. But, forget the rfid (?) until the dutch resolves the appeal for that money they were awarded (at least another year of litigation). Well, take it for what it's worth. I'm impressed that they've survived. They're lean enough to make it, depending on financing and the economy.
|
   
Killernut
Registered Member Username: Killernut
Post Number: 163 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, December 19, 2003 - 02:47 pm: |
|
Good news, I would say except it is probably only a tiny order. It is a foot in the door though. I am convinced that SKVY has decent products and has done a good job on cost cutting, now they just need sales and more sales to generate profits! Nothing else is going to move SKVY out of the $.08 - .16 range IMO. |
   
Tychobrahe
Registered Member Username: Tychobrahe
Post Number: 167 Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Friday, December 19, 2003 - 01:15 pm: |
|
Wow! How 'bout this! http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031219/nyf010_1.html |